dri
science.environment.solutions
 
line decor
     
line decor
 

Impact of Small Ice Crystals on GCM Simulations

David L. Mitchell1, Philip Rascht2, Dorothea Ivanova3,
Greg McFarquhar4, and Timo Nousiainen5

1) Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV
2) National Center for Atmospheric Reseach, Boulder, Colorado
3) Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona
4) University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
5) University of Helsinki, Finland

NSF logo full
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF),
Grant No. ATM-0413401.

Abstract

In the prediction of climate change, the greatest uncertainty lies in representing the clouds. Ice clouds are particularly challenging, and to date there is no accepted method for measuring the concentrations of small (D < 60 µm) ice crystals. This study examines the sensitivity of a global climate model to different assumptions regarding the number concentrations of small ice crystals when they are allowed to affect ice sedimentation rates. When their concentrations are relatively high, the GCM predicts a 12% increase in cloud ice amount and a 5.5% increase in cirrus cloud coverage globally. This produces a net cloud forcing of -5 W m-2 in the tropics and warms the upper tropical troposphere over 3 °C. Ice crystal concentration differences assumed were modest in comparison to corresponding measurement uncertainties, revealing a potentially large source of uncertainty in the prediction of global climate.

The GCM Experiment:

text box 1

Small mode enhancement with decreasing T for PSD2; opposite for PSD1 graph

Two GCM 1-year simulations were conducted using the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). Each simulation used the same treatment for ice fall velocity (Mitchell and Heymsfield 2005; Ivanova et al. 2001) and ice cloud optical properties (Mitchell 2002; Mitchell et al. 2006), but differed in the treatment of the PSD. These two PSD schemes are illustrated above, with one simulation using PSD1 and the other using PSD2.

Temperature dependence of median mass dimension graph

The temperature dependence of the median mass-dimension (Dm) of the PSD is illustrated above for the PSD1 and PSD2 size distribution schemes. The ice fall speed for a given mode of the PSD is based on Dm and crystal shape. The PSD1 scheme assumes mostly bullet rosettes, while the PSD2 scheme assumes mostly planar polycrystals.



PSD median mass flux fall velocities graph

The overall ice fall speed for the PSD, Vt, is weighted by the ice water content of each mode of the PSD times the corresponding fall velocity. Note that Vt does not depend on the total PSD ice water content, IWC. The temperature dependence of Vt is shown above for PSD1 and PSD2.


PSD Impact on ice water path (IWP) graph
(Click on images to enlarge)
Difference in IWP, PSD2 - PSD1 simulation map
PSD Impact on high-level cloud coverage
(Click on image to enlarge)

CAM results: PSD2 vs. PSD1 simulations
(Click on image to enlarge)
PSD2 minus PSD1 simulations: Cloud forcing
(Click on image to enlarge)

Heating rates and tropical cold bias
(Click on image to enlarge)

Summary

  1. Two temperature dependent parameterizations of ice particle size distributions (PSD) were incorporated into NCAR’s Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3), along with corresponding ice mass sedimentation rates and radiative properties. The main difference between PSD schemes was the concentration of small (D < 60 µm) ice crystals.
  2. Higher small ice crystal concentrations resulted in lower ice fall speeds and greater cirrus IWP and coverage. This produced large changes in cloud forcing relative to the simulation with lower small crystal concentrations (PSD1), with a net cloud forcing in the tropics of -5 W m-2. Temperatures in the upper tropical troposphere were over 3 °C warmer relative to PSD1.
  3. The PSD schemes used here underestimate the observed uncertainty in small ice crystal concentrations from in situ measurements. As the cloud microphysics in GCMs becomes more realistic, these large uncertainties in small ice crystal concentrations may produce large uncertainties in surface warming in GCM CO2 doubling experiments. A greater focus on this problem appears warranted.

DRI Home | Privacy Policy | ©2007 Desert Research Institute