Impact of Small Ice Crystals
on GCM Simulations
David L. Mitchell1, Philip Rascht2, Dorothea Ivanova3, Greg McFarquhar4, and Timo Nousiainen5
1) Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV
2) National Center for Atmospheric Reseach, Boulder, Colorado
3) Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona
4) University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
5) University of Helsinki, Finland

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF),
Grant No. ATM-0413401. |
|
Abstract
In the prediction of climate change, the greatest uncertainty lies in representing
the clouds. Ice clouds are particularly challenging, and to date there is no
accepted method for measuring the concentrations of small (D < 60 µm) ice
crystals. This study examines the sensitivity of a global climate model to
different assumptions regarding the number concentrations of small ice crystals
when they are allowed to affect ice sedimentation rates. When their
concentrations are relatively high, the GCM predicts a 12% increase in cloud
ice amount and a 5.5% increase in cirrus cloud coverage globally. This
produces a net cloud forcing of -5 W m-2 in the tropics and warms the upper
tropical troposphere over 3 °C. Ice crystal concentration differences assumed
were modest in comparison to corresponding measurement uncertainties,
revealing a potentially large source of uncertainty in the prediction of global
climate. |
The GCM Experiment: |
|
Two GCM 1-year simulations were conducted using the Community Atmosphere
Model version 3 (CAM3). Each simulation used the same treatment for ice
fall velocity (Mitchell and Heymsfield 2005; Ivanova et al. 2001) and ice cloud
optical properties (Mitchell 2002; Mitchell et al. 2006), but differed in the
treatment of the PSD. These two PSD schemes are illustrated above, with
one simulation using PSD1 and the other using PSD2. |
|

The temperature dependence of the median mass-dimension (Dm) of the PSD is
illustrated above for the PSD1 and PSD2 size distribution schemes. The ice
fall speed for a given mode of the PSD is based on Dm and crystal shape. The
PSD1 scheme assumes mostly bullet rosettes, while the PSD2 scheme assumes
mostly planar polycrystals. |
The overall ice fall speed for the PSD, Vt, is weighted by the ice water content
of each mode of the PSD times the corresponding fall velocity. Note that Vt
does not depend on the total PSD ice water content, IWC. The temperature
dependence of Vt is shown above for PSD1 and PSD2. |
|
(Click on images to enlarge)
|
(Click on image to enlarge) |
|
(Click on image to enlarge) |
(Click on image to enlarge) |
|
(Click on image to enlarge) |
Summary
- Two temperature dependent parameterizations of ice particle size distributions (PSD) were incorporated into NCAR’s Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3), along with corresponding ice mass sedimentation rates and radiative properties. The main difference between PSD schemes was the concentration of small (D < 60 µm) ice crystals.
- Higher small ice crystal concentrations resulted in lower ice fall speeds and greater cirrus IWP and coverage. This produced large changes in cloud forcing relative to the simulation with lower small crystal concentrations (PSD1), with a net cloud forcing in the tropics of -5 W m-2. Temperatures in the upper tropical troposphere were over 3 °C warmer relative to PSD1.
- The PSD schemes used here underestimate the observed uncertainty in small ice crystal concentrations from in situ measurements. As the cloud microphysics in GCMs becomes more realistic, these large uncertainties in small ice crystal concentrations may produce large uncertainties in surface warming in GCM CO2 doubling experiments. A greater focus on this problem appears warranted.
|
|
|
|